ConstitutionDAO 價格PEOPLE

We’ve all heard it “Buy the dip” It sounds simple the price drops, you jump in, and wait for the bounce. But let’s be real… not every dip is a good one. Here’s what I’ve learned (sometimes the hard way) 1. The trend matters If the project’s been bleeding for weeks with no updates, maybe it’s not just a dip, maybe it’s losing steam. 2. Check the fundamentals Did something actually change for the better? Is the team building, the community active, or is it just quiet?? 3. Volume speaks louder than price A dip with no buying volume might just keep dipping. Always check if people are actually buying it up. 4. Don’t chase just because it’s cheap A lower price doesn’t always mean a better deal. Sometimes the best move is to wait. Buying dips can work, but only when you’ve done your homework. It’s not about catching every red candle…. it’s about entering smart and staying patient. Trade with intention, not just emotion.

According to reports, the US Treasury Department is looking into a $75 million investment by Benchmark Capital in the Chinese company Manus AI. This now escalates the tech rivalry between the US and China and the desire of the US to maintain its position at the forefront. Officials from the department recently asked the Silicon Valley company if the funding is covered by new rules that limit investments in AI and other important technologies going to China. The law, which is based on the Outbound Investment Security Program, was part of an order made by President Joe Biden in 2023. However, it didn’t become law until earlier this year. It dictates that anyone or any organization in the US has to tell the Treasury Department about any investments they make in key areas like AI that could “accelerate and increase the success of the development of sensitive technologies” that are not in the US’s best interests. In March, Manus released a great demo movie called “Second DeepSeek Moment.” The company showed that its AI agent could do difficult tasks by itself, such as long study projects and making websites and apps independently. OpenAI’s CEO, on the other hand, is urging US lawmakers not to make rules that will slow down the US AI. A number of US law companies told Benchmark that the investment did not violate the rules on outbound investments since Manus was not creating its own AI models. Its lawyers also came to the conclusion that the company is not actually based in China. A person familiar with the situation says that the company’s parent Butterfly Effect is based in the Cayman Islands and has workers in the US, Singapore, Japan, and China. The person said that Manus saves all of its data on cloud servers run by Western companies that are not in China. Still, some Silicon Valley investors don’t like the investment in Manus. For example, Josh Wolfe, co-founder of Lux Capital, wrote on X that the investment “makes zero sense.” Delian Asparouhov, a partner at Founders Fund, also said , “I am not saying Benchmark partners are Chinese assets[…]But they are def assets to China.” On the other hand, when Microsoft President Brad Smith was asked if Benchmark’s investment in Manus was in the US national interest. One of the best-known venture investors in the business, Bill Gurley, is a general partner at Benchmark. He has spoken out against efforts to cut ties with China According to him, “Our nation’s recent curbs on Nvidia H20s, intended to slow China AI innovation, will enhance & accelerate Chinese AI innovation. This action will create the OPPOSITE of the intent.” However, many people are afraid that Chinese technology could give Beijing an easy way to get information. And there are new claims that Chinese students at Stanford, especially those studying AI, are being forced to work as spies for China. This is happening in the middle of Silicon Valley. According to reports, even startups that have widely used DeepSeek’s open-source AI models are using technology that might have unknown security holes that could help China. To ensure that even more dollars don’t get through the cracks in the rules, the Trump administration is considering putting even more limits on investments going to China. Benchmark is known for carefully choosing which startups to invest in and is one of Silicon Valley’s most successful venture capital firms. It gave companies like eBay, Twitter, Uber, and Snap their first investments. Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites

Google agreed to a $1.375B data privacy settlement with the Lone Star State over the alleged use of facial recognition, location data, and Chrome incognito. To date, no state has attained a settlement against Google for similar data privacy violations greater than $93M. Texas Attorney General (AG) Ken Paxton won a $1.375B settlement from Google to resolve claims of illegally tracking users’ geolocation, incognito searches, and biometric data. The attorney general said the settlement, which covered allegations in two separate lawsuits against the search engine and app giant, dwarfed all past settlements by other states with Google for similar data privacy violations. Google’s settlement came approximately 10 months after Paxton obtained a $1.4 billion settlement for Texas from Meta to resolve claims of unauthorized use of biometric data of Facebook and Instagram users. The attorney general said in a statement on Friday that Big Tech is not above the law in Texas. AG Paxton secured a $1.375 billion settlement with Google to deliver a historic win for the people of Texas with regard to data privacy and security rights. Even a multistate coalition that included forty states only secured just $391 million—almost a billion dollars less than Texas’s recovery. Paxton sued Google in 2022 for unlawfully tracking and collecting users’ private data. However, Google spokesman Jose Castaneda claimed that the company did not admit any wrongdoing or liability in the settlement, which involved allegations related to the Chrome browser’s incognito setting, disclosures related to location history on the Google Maps app, and biometric claims related to Google Photos. Paxton stated that this billion-dollar settlement was a major win for Texans’ privacy, and it told companies that they would pay for abusing the trust of his state’s residents. “For years, Google secretly tracked people’s movements, private searches, and even their voiceprints and facial geometry through their products and services. I fought back and won.” -Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas Notably, Castaneda said Google did not have to make any changes to products in connection with the settlement and that all of the policy changes that the company made in connection with the allegations were previously announced or implemented. Meta previously agreed to pay a record $1.4 billion to settle a lawsuit by the state of Texas over the Facebook owner’s unauthorized use of biometric data from users. Paxton’s office said ‘unbeknownst to most Texans,’ Meta ran facial recognition software on virtually every face contained in the photographs uploaded to Facebook for over a decade, capturing records of the facial geometry of the people depicted. The AG’s Meta settlement was a rare win against Big Tech’s surveillance overreach—but it was just the tip of the iceberg. Meta’s decade-long facial recognition scheme proved that Silicon Valley viewed privacy as optional until states started to crack down on big techs. Notably, Paxton asserted that any abuse of Texans’ sensitive data would be met with the full force of the law. The Texas AG said the win against Meta stopped the company’s practice of capturing and using the personal biometric data of millions of Texans without the authorization required by law. However, a spokesperson for Meta disclosed that the company was pleased to resolve the matter and looked forward to exploring future opportunities to deepen its business investments in Texas, including potentially developing data centers. KEY Difference Wire : the secret tool crypto projects use to get guaranteed media coverage

Prosecutors in the Samourai Wallet case have denied violating the Brady rule. According to a letter sent to the Southern District of New York (SDNY) filed today, the prosecutors mentioned that they did not withhold exculpatory evidence. In the letter, the prosecutors also urged the judge to deny any request by Samourai for a late hearing to discuss the late disclosure of key information they obtained from the FinCEN two years ago. Earlier in the week, Samourai had sent their letter to the judge, alleging that they had learned that FinCEN had strongly suggested that Samourai Wallet was not acting as a money-transmitting business. In the letter, they said that it was mainly down to the noncustodial nature of the product in a discussion between certain FinCEN members and the prosecutors on August 23, 2023. This new information came to light after the defense submitted a Brady motion . This motion was named after the Brady v. Maryland Supreme Court case, which occurred in 1963. The case established the Brady rule, which mentioned that exculpatory evidence should be provided to the defense so it can be used as part of the due process. In this case, the defense felt that the evidence was hidden, causing the need for a new hearing. Also, since one of the two charges against the Samourai Wallet developers is conspiring to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business, some people felt this new information might be grounds to dismiss the entire case. However, in the letter, the investigators specifically mentioned that they have no intentions of dropping the case. They also feel the defense has no special basis to demand a new hearing. “There is no basis for a hearing, nor is there anything to remedy: the disclosure itself shows that the government has not violated Brady,” the prosecutors stated in the letter. “The Government disclosed all known substantive communications between the prosecution team and FinCEN months in advance of pretrial motions and trial.” The prosecutors also added that they want to go ahead with the case, noting that they are going to include a second charge, which is conspiracy to commit money laundering. In their letter, they mentioned that Samourai helped launder over $100 million of criminal proceeds originating from questionable sources, including illegal darkweb markets like Silk Road and Hydra Market. They also added that they moved funds associated with wire fraud, computer fraud, and schemes that stole funds from their victims, including phishing and other schemes to defraud multiple decentralized finance protocols. The prosecutors also mentioned that the fact that they recently disclosed their communication with FinCEN is irrelevant to the case, adding that much of the charged conduct does not rely on FinCEN regulations. They downplayed the importance of the details shared by the FinCEN employees who spoke to the prosecutors. Kevin O’conner, Chief of FinCEN’s Virtual Assets and Emerging Technology Section in the Enforcement and Compliance Division, and Lorena Valente, an employee of FinCEN’s Policy Division, spoke with the prosecutors. According to the prosecutors, the input from O’Connor and Valente was based on their individual processes, noting that they already provided “substantive email correspondence between the prosecution team and members of FinCEN relating to the August 23, 2023, call.” “The individual employees of FinCEN were not speaking on behalf of FinCEN, they were not providing FinCEN’s opinion, and they did not have a sense of what FinCEN would decide if this question were presented to their FinCEN policy committee,” they added. In the letter’s final section, the prosecutors denied violating legal norms. “The record shows that there was no Brady violation in this case,” wrote the prosecutors. “The government disclosed the contents of this informal conversation to the defense in advance of pretrial motions and approximately seven months in advance of trial in response to a request for that information,” they added. “Nothing more is required.” Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites

Conor McGregor, the 36-year-old UFC legend with 22 wins and 6 losses, has urged his homeland to become a crypto hub by implementing a digital asset reserve. He asserted that crypto in its origin was “founded to give power back to the people,” and noted that he will co-host a Twitter (X) space to “talk about what I want to see changed.” While he spoke about both crypto and Bitcoin in terms of Irish reserve, many of the comments below his original post urged him and his country to focus only on the largest digital asset. Anthony Pompliano was among the first to pick up McGregor’s call for a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve in Ireland and, expectedly, praised the move. The notion of countries adopting BTC as a strategic reserve asset has been talked about for years within the community. However, it was just a distant dream until very recently. The idea is that bitcoin has similar qualities like gold, and the yellow metal used to back numerous fiat currencies and is still held en mass by numerous central banks. So, why not BTC, right? Well, the critics have argued for the past few years that bitcoin is too young and volatile and hasn’t matured yet to be in such a responsible position. After the US elections, though, the tides have turned. Current US President Donald Trump has dabbled with the idea of establishing a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve in the country, and there are multiple discussions on the matter among different countries. Although it still feels too early, as most are just that – discussions or blatant rejections – it could be considered as a move in the right direction. It has to start from somewhere, right?