Ціна Act I : The AI ProphecyACT

Bermuda’s long-term commitment to regulatory clarity is paying off. It is now home to some of the most forward-thinking players in digital assets. OpenEden Digital is proud to be regulated under the BMA’s Digital Asset Business Act, building the future of stablecoins and tokenized RWAs with trust at the core. As stablecoins go mainstream, frameworks like BMA’s will define the next generation of trusted issuers.

U.S. CFTC nominee says Clarity Act could spur crypto innovation while protecting consumers At his Senate confirmation hearing on June 10, Brian Quintenz, nominated by U.S. President Donald Trump to lead the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), expressed support for the

Some industry players have raised concerns ahead of today’s CLARITY Act, a market structure bill that would expand the CFTC’s role and clarify how digital assets are classified and regulated. The critics believe there’s a new section in the amended text they’re describing as a ‘Gensler-era provision.” ‘The Gensler-era provisions’ would eliminate exemptions for previously issued tokens, instead giving the U.S. SEC sweeping authority to determine whether each token qualifies as a security. Critics say the approach reintroduces uncertainty about what the bill is meant to resolve. Committee Chairman French Hill introduced the CLARITY Act of H.R. 3633 on May 30, which is currently continuing its markup of the Act at its June 10, 2025, Full Committee Markup hearing. The bill is expected to expand the CFTC’s authority over cryptocurrency markets by establishing a new regulated framework for digital commodities. Hill stated at today’s markup that the Committee held a thoughtful and constructive hearing on digital asset market structure legislation, the CLARITY Act. According to him, the crypto industry has been plagued by regulatory uncertainty, and the absence of clear rules has stifled innovation, discouraged entrepreneurs, and confused investors. “Digital assets and blockchain technology have the potential to fundamentally reshape how we interact with the internet. These innovations can unlock opportunity, empower individuals, and expand access to the financial system, but we need a regulatory framework in place to experience these benefits.” –French Hill, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. In a notice released ahead of the hearing, Hill also introduced an amendment to the CLARITY Act that focuses on the treatment of certain non-controlling blockchain developers. According to the proposed amendment, certain blockchain developers or service providers would not be considered money transmitters or subject to their registration requirements. The Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act has been partly shadowed by calls for provisions to stop Trump from potentially using the legislation to his personal benefit. Representative Bryan Steil, who chairs the digital asset committee, said his Republican colleagues refused to acknowledge President Trump’s crypto corruption allegations, which he believes limit their efforts to pass the bill. Representative Maxine Waters, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, has not mentioned anything to suggest that she and many other Democrats will vote for the legislation if the time comes. Waters had organized a Minority Day hearing on Friday to address allegations of corruption through the U.S. President Donald Trump’s ties to the crypto industry. The California lawmaker acknowledged that no provision within the CLARITY Act addresses the crimes she laid out. Before Trump’s dinner to reward his memecoin holders on May 22, Waters unveiled a separate bill to block the president, vice president, members of Congress, and their families from engaging with digital assets. She also believes that the bill only legitimizes the alleged crimes by Trump. Democratic Representative Ritchie Torres, who has previously advocated for legislation impacting the crypto industry, has suggested he will support the market structure bill. Tuesday’s markup hearing will include crucial discussion and vote for amendments to the bill before potentially sending the bill to the full chamber. Lawmakers are also expected to vote in the Senate soon on the GENIUS Act – a bill to regulate the payment of stablecoins. Vice President JD Vance, on May 28, called for eliminating regulatory barriers to the crypto sector, acknowledging the end of Operation Chokepoint 2.0. He also highlighted the need to pass stablecoin legislation that fosters innovation while providing legal clarity. Vance also supported the comprehensive market structure bill to define the regulatory framework for other digital assets. He reaffirmed the administration’s commitment to advancing pro-crypto policies and urged the industry to continue pushing for legislative action. Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal believes that the stablecoin legislation has made incredible progress because there’s bipartisan consensus that it’s in the U.S.’s interest to have sensible rules for stablecoins. Grewal also said the market structure bill is equally important for long-term stability and growth. KEY Difference Wire helps crypto brands break through and dominate headlines fast

The Bitcoin Core development team has announced a major update in the upcoming October Core 30 release. The changes will increase the OP_RETURN data limit from 80 bytes to nearly 4 MB. The proposal removes the long-standing default size limits on OP_RETURN, a transaction commonly used to embed non-financial data into the blockchain. Right now, Bitcoin Core only allows a small amount of data in OP_RETURN. The update would let Core relay much larger transactions by default. The idea has received both support and criticism on GitHub, with the debate centered on whether Bitcoin nodes should block non-monetary transactions or act as neutral relayers of any valid transaction. Those against it argue that removing the limit could invite spam and non-monetary data into Bitcoin blocks, which could occupy space intended for financial transactions. According to them, keeping the current limits protects Bitcoin’s economic value and keeps it efficient. They also say that removing settings like -datacarriersize would reduce node control. Comments from Seccour, chrisguida, and wizkid057 express concern that the change gives in to spammers and encourages misuse of Bitcoin. They all agree that the network should resist spam instead of making it easier. Supporters of the update believe that storing arbitrary data on Bitcoin is already happening and cannot be stopped. They say trying to block it leads to users resorting to worse methods, such as making private deals with miners. The group argues that OP_RETURN is the least harmful method. This is because it is small, cannot be spent, and does not add to the UTXO set. They say increasing the limit can guide data use to this cleaner method and avoid worse alternatives. Comments from murchandamus and eragmus support the decision, with one arguing that it would reduce node traffic and help prevent miner centralization. The other explained that it is a practical change that matches how the network is already used. Bitcoin Core has limited OP_RETURN to 80 bytes since 2014. However, developers announced in May that the cap would be removed in the next version. In a recent statement, they explained that the decision aligns with Core’s goal of reflecting economically relevant activity by ensuring that transactions likely to be mined are relayed. They added that blocking these transactions weakens decentralization, drives users to alternative channels, and ultimately fails to keep the data off the blockchain. Allowing them, they explained, preserves Bitcoin’s censorship resistance and ensures the network operates efficiently. “This is not endorsing or condoning non-financial data usage, but accepting that as a censorship-resistant system, Bitcoin can and will be used for use cases not everyone agrees on,” the statement read.

Stablecoin blockchain project Plasma raised $500 million in its token sale, ten times its initial $50 million goal. These explosive numbers were not just a flashpoint in crypto fundraising – it signaled something deeper: the beginning of a broader alignment between the decentralized world of crypto and the structures of global finance, according to Santiment. Plasma’s public sale, hosted on Cobie-backed Sonar, was oversubscribed within minutes, which prompted organizers to double the cap from $250 million. The rush of capital showed that large investors are increasingly looking beyond meme coins, seeking serious infrastructure plays with long-term utility. Backed by major names like Tether, Bitfinex, and Peter Thiel, Plasma markets itself as a “stablechain,” designed specifically to support stablecoin transfers. While the sale didn’t distribute tokens outright, only future purchase options, it still generated intense demand, and participants were drawn to the prospect of earning yield while waiting. However, data from the sale revealed stark inequalities. The top 10 wallets contributed roughly 40% of the total funds, and a single whale deposited the maximum of $50 million. The average wallet size of $450,000 and a reported $100,000 gas fee spent by one user just to secure a spot reignited concerns over fairness, and echoed the ICO frenzy of 2017 and the gas wars of the 2021 NFT boom. Retail investors largely felt locked out, with many voicing frustration over high barriers to entry. Despite these drawbacks, the Plasma raise stands out as an indicator of progress, as per the crypto analytic platform. After a prolonged period dominated by speculation and joke tokens, the crypto market appears to be returning to fundamentals. The success of Sonar, which is being touted as a more structured, transparent launch platform, reflected a shift in investor appetite toward products that offer predictability, utility, and reduced risk. This evolution isn’t happening in isolation. The rise of stablecoin infrastructure like Plasma coincides with moves in traditional finance, such as the proposed GENIUS Act in the US and the public listing of USDC issuer Circle on the New York Stock Exchange. While the Plasma ICO had its flaws, as it was dominated by whales and inaccessible to smaller investors due to high fees, it still marked progress. The strong interest suggests that investors are shifting focus back to serious projects, which coincides with crypto’s broader rally and Bitcoin’s push toward new highs. “So taking a step back, the Plasma sale wasn’t just about one blockchain… it was actually part of a larger movement where crypto is starting to align with global financial systems.”