Fed's Internal Disagreements on Rate Cuts Complicate Trump's Monetary Plans
- Fed officials clash over December rate cut, complicating Trump's monetary agenda amid internal divisions. - New York's Williams supports potential cut, while Boston's Collins argues against "strong need," reflecting economic uncertainty. - Outdated inflation data and global central bank decisions amplify ambiguity as markets await Fed's December decision. - Trump's 2026 chair appointment pledge faces skepticism as current Fed struggles to balance inflation control with growth risks.
Recent comments from a top Federal Reserve official have raised questions about the chances of a rate cut in December, revealing growing disagreements within the Fed and complicating President Donald Trump’s push to influence monetary policy. Last week, New York Fed President John Williams indicated that a rate reduction "in the near term" might still be justified, but Boston Fed President Susan Collins argued there is "no strong need" for another cut next month. These opposing viewpoints highlight the difficulties facing Chair Jerome Powell, who
This uncertainty has heightened market attention on key economic indicators, such as the Fed’s Beige Book, which is set for release on Wednesday. With the federal government postponing its separate October inflation data, policymakers will have to rely on September’s numbers when they meet in December. The absence of up-to-date inflation figures adds to the confusion, especially as global investors await decisions from central banks in New Zealand, South Korea, and the United Kingdom,
Trump has frequently claimed that interest rates will inevitably fall once he appoints a new Fed chair in May 2026. However, the current discord within the central bank suggests that even if a rate cut occurs, it may not meet the president’s expectations. Williams’ willingness to consider a cut stands in contrast to Collins’ more cautious approach, reflecting a wider debate about the direction of the economy. The Fed’s reluctance is further complicated by the lack of agreement on how recent policy changes are affecting the economy,
This situation has left investors waiting on the sidelines, with markets poised to react strongly to any unexpected developments at the December meeting. Experts point out that the Fed’s dependence on older data—specifically September’s employment and inflation reports—adds another layer of unpredictability. At the same time, international economic trends,
As the debate continues, investors are also watching alternative signals, like yield curves and consumer confidence measures, to anticipate possible policy changes. For example, the yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury note has seen significant fluctuations lately, reflecting uncertainty about the Fed’s upcoming actions.
Despite all these factors, the Fed’s decision for December remains highly unpredictable. The internal split reflects the broader challenge of balancing inflation management with supporting economic expansion. As the global economy evolves and emerging markets gain more influence, the Fed’s choices are expected to have significant impacts both in the U.S. and around the world
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Stablecoin Market Exceeds $280B as ECB Warns of Potential Systemic Risks
- Stablecoin market exceeds $280B, driven by regulatory clarity and institutional adoption, capturing 8% of crypto assets. - ECB warns of systemic risks from stablecoin concentration, de-pegging events, and mass redemption "runs" threatening global markets. - USDC overtakes USDT in onchain activity due to regulatory alignment, with Circle's market cap rising 72% YTD to $74B. - ECB calls for global regulatory coordination to address cross-border arbitrage gaps and prevent destabilizing retail deposit shifts

Bitcoin News Update: MicroStrategy Faces an Identity Dilemma—Is It a Technology Company or a Bitcoin Holding Entity?
- MicroStrategy faces potential MSCI index reclassification as a Bitcoin investment vehicle, risking $8.8B in passive fund outflows. - The debate centers on whether crypto-heavy firms should be classified as operating businesses or passive funds, impacting capital access and valuation. - CEO Michael Saylor defends MSTR as a "structured finance company," leveraging Bitcoin-backed securities to differentiate from passive vehicles. - Compressed stock-to-NAV multiples and Bitcoin's price slump threaten MSTR's

Japan Sets Out to Rebuild Investor Confidence in Crypto Following Significant Security Breaches
- Japan's FSA will mandate crypto exchanges to hold liability reserves proportional to trading volumes and security risks, modeled after traditional securities safeguards. - The reform responds to major breaches like the 2024 DMM Bitcoin hack ($312M stolen) and allows exchanges to offset reserve costs via insurance policies. - New rules require segregating user funds from corporate assets and reclassify crypto as securities under the Financial Instruments Act to enable investment products. - Experts view t

Bitcoin News Today: Bitcoin's Rebound Fails to Ease Crypto's Liquidity Crunch
- Bitcoin's $80,000 rebound failed to reverse crypto's liquidity crisis as structural risks deepen amid macroeconomic pressures and thinning market liquidity. - Total crypto market cap fell below $3 trillion with $950M+ liquidations, while Bitcoin's dominance dropped below 49% as capital rotated into altcoins like HBAR and HYPE. - Institutional divergence emerged: spot ETFs saw $1.38B redemptions while on-chain accumulators added 42,000 BTC, contrasting with long-term investors offloading ~42,000 BTC this
