Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
Quantum Danger To Bitcoin Overhyped, Says Adam Back

Quantum Danger To Bitcoin Overhyped, Says Adam Back

CointribuneCointribune2025/11/18 09:36
By:Cointribune
Summarize this article with:
ChatGPT Perplexity Grok

While the shadow of the quantum computer looms over digital security, could bitcoin really waver? Faced with the hypothesis of a network made vulnerable by machines capable of breaking SHA-256, opinions diverge. Some anticipate an imminent threat, others temper their expectations. Among them, Adam Back, a figure of the cypherpunk movement and CEO of Blockstream, invites nuance. His reading, both technical and strategic, repositions the debate on concrete grounds, far from catastrophic scenarios, while posing the real questions about the future resilience of the protocol.

Quantum Danger To Bitcoin Overhyped, Says Adam Back image 0 Quantum Danger To Bitcoin Overhyped, Says Adam Back image 1

In brief

  • Adam Back states that Bitcoin faces no risk from quantum computing for 20 to 40 years.
  • The cryptographer points out that certified post-quantum solutions already exist and can be integrated in time.
  • The critical threshold to break SHA-256 is estimated at 8,000 logical qubits, far beyond current capabilities.
  • Today’s quantum computers remain too noisy or insufficiently powerful to threaten Bitcoin’s cryptography.

Adam Back reassures : bitcoin faces no risk for several decades

While the threat approaches step by step , Adam Back gave a direct answer during his questioning on November 15 on X about bitcoin’s possible vulnerability to quantum computing : “probably not before 20 to 40 years”.

For the CEO of Blockstream, cited in Satoshi Nakamoto’s whitepaper, fears of a cryptographic collapse are, at this stage, largely premature. He specifies that post-quantum cryptography algorithms validated by the NIST already exist and could be integrated “well before quantum computers capable of breaking cryptographic systems arrive”.

These statements follow a video by Chamath Palihapitiya claiming bitcoin could be compromised within two to five years. Adam Back rejects this prediction, based on the current state of quantum hardware, still far from reaching the critical threshold.

To illustrate the gap between the current capabilities of quantum computers and the technical requirements to threaten bitcoin, several concrete elements are put forward :

  • Breaking SHA-256, the basis of bitcoin’s security, would require about 8,000 logical qubits. These are not simple physical qubits but extremely stable and error-corrected qubits.
  • The current record is held by Caltech with 6,100 physical qubits, far from sufficient to conduct a viable attack. This machine cannot even break RSA-2048, which requires about 4,000 logical qubits in a perfect theoretical model.
  • Error correction is a major obstacle: for example, Quantinuum has reached 98 physical qubits, but that only allowed producing 48 truly usable logical qubits.
  • On the side of universal quantum gate systems, Atom Computing has surpassed the 1,000 physical qubit mark, without approaching a capacity exploitable for large-scale cryptanalysis.

In other words, the technological gap remains vast. And according to Adam Back, bitcoin has time to react, but also the cryptographic tools needed to anticipate without haste.

An indirect vulnerability, but already present

If the direct threat of a quantum attack on bitcoin seems today largely premature, some researchers emphasize another, more insidious danger: the storage of encrypted data with the intent to decrypt it later, a strategy known as “harvest now, decrypt later.”

Gianluca Di Bella, specialist in smart contracts and zero-knowledge proofs, believes this threat should already push us to act : “we should migrate now”, he states . For him, even if the commercial quantum computer is still ten or fifteen years away, “large institutions like Microsoft or Google could have a solution within a few years”, he stresses, suggesting that the race for quantum supremacy could accelerate faster than expected.

This attack strategy, although inoperative on bitcoin’s model, where security depends on possession of private keys and not data confidentiality, concerns a much wider range of encrypted communications. It could have dramatic consequences in sensitive political or geopolitical contexts. A dissident, for example, protected today by asymmetric encryption, could see their data compromised in a decade if it was intercepted today by an entity that later has a quantum computer capable of reading it.

Thus, a question arises about technological governance and digital sovereignty. If post-quantum standards are already validated, when and how will they be integrated into existing protocols? Who will oversee the implementation? And above all, will bitcoin users be ready to consent to potential technical changes required? As cloud, AI, and Web3 giants invest in quantum, the question of post-quantum migration emerges as a long-term imperative, but its timing remains uncertain.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

PhotonPay wins the Adam Smith Award for its innovative foreign exchange solutions, reshaping the global forex management landscape

How does PhotonPay collaborate with JPMorgan Kinexys to leverage blockchain technology for 24/7, automated global fund allocation?

Chaincatcher2025/11/18 16:17
PhotonPay wins the Adam Smith Award for its innovative foreign exchange solutions, reshaping the global forex management landscape

Compliant privacy: What is the latest Ethereum privacy upgrade, Kohaku?

Vitalik once said, "If there is no privacy transformation, Ethereum will fail."

Chaincatcher2025/11/18 16:17
Compliant privacy: What is the latest Ethereum privacy upgrade, Kohaku?

Danny Ryan: Wall Street needs decentralization more than you think, and Ethereum is the only answer

A former Ethereum Foundation researcher provided an in-depth analysis during the Devconnect ARG 2025 talk, explaining how eliminating counterparty risk and building L2 solutions could enable the management of 120 trillion in global assets.

Chaincatcher2025/11/18 16:16
Danny Ryan: Wall Street needs decentralization more than you think, and Ethereum is the only answer