Trump's increase in H-1B fees seeks to protect domestic employment, but may threaten technological advancement
- Trump administration imposes $100,000/year H-1B visa fee from Sept 20, 2025, alongside $1M "gold card" residency program, triggering tech sector disruptions. - Policy disproportionately impacts India's $283B IT outsourcing industry (71% of H-1B approvals) and small startups, risking project relocations and innovation migration to Asia/Europe. - Legal challenges emerge due to bypassed administrative review, while critics warn of stifled innovation and a two-tiered immigration system favoring wealthy appli

The Trump administration has unveiled major changes to the H-1B visa system, introducing a $100,000 yearly charge per visa effective September 20, 2025. This decision has caused immediate upheaval in the technology industry and raised legal questions. The measure, part of a broader immigration overhaul, is designed to favor U.S. workers by making it more expensive to hire foreign professionals, while also launching a $1 million "gold card" residency option for wealthy applicants.
This new fee, a significant increase from the previous $1,700–$4,500 application range, has prompted leading tech firms such as
India’s IT outsourcing sector, valued at $283 billion and responsible for 71% of H-1B approvals, has been especially impacted. Nasscom, a prominent industry association, cautioned that the fee could destabilize the sector, potentially forcing companies to move high-value projects abroad or switch to remote work to avoid the expense. Experts warn that this policy could speed up the migration of talent and innovation to competing regions in Asia and Europe, threatening America’s edge in technology and AI.
The administration has justified the policy as a way to put American workers first. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik argued that the fee would push businesses to train local graduates instead of relying on foreign labor. Detractors, however, say the move blurs the line between legal immigration and protectionism, and could hinder innovation by restricting access to global talent. Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO and a former H-1B recipient, has described the program as vital for filling skills shortages in the U.S. workforce.
Legal obstacles are expected. The sudden rollout sidestepped the usual administrative review required by the Administrative Procedure Act, raising concerns about due process and the separation of powers. Immigration specialists point out that the EB-5 visa, which mandates job creation, is protected by law until 2027. However, the new "gold card" residency—offering permanent status for $1 million without job creation—may face lawsuits for undermining the legal basis of the existing program.
The long-term effects on the U.S. tech industry are unclear. While large corporations might absorb the extra costs, smaller firms and startups could face existential threats. For example, a crypto startup with 10 H-1B employees would owe $1 million annually in fees, diverting funds from innovation. The policy may also discourage future immigrant founders, as 20% of U.S. venture-backed startups are led by immigrants who often transition to H-1B visas after studying in the country.
Other countries, including China, are moving to attract this talent. Beijing has broadened fast-track work visas for foreign tech professionals and entrepreneurs, while Canada’s Global Talent Stream grants expedited permits within weeks. These initiatives underscore the risk of a "brain drain" from the U.S., as companies and skilled workers seek more stable and affordable immigration options elsewhere.
The Trump administration’s approach—raising barriers for skilled immigrants while offering residency to the wealthy—has been criticized for creating a system of inequality. Affluent individuals can bypass the H-1B fee by paying $1 million, but skilled workers without significant resources are left with limited choices, deepening disparities in access to U.S. opportunities.
As legal disputes continue and global competition for talent heats up, the outcome of this policy will depend on whether it can balance the needs of the domestic workforce with the necessity of preserving U.S. leadership in innovation. For now, the technology sector faces ongoing uncertainty, with widespread effects anticipated for industries that depend on highly skilled immigrants.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
New spot margin trading pair — 0G/USDT!
Bitget Builders stories: The architect behind Bitget's 30M views!
Bitget Trading Club Championship (Phase 10)—Trade spot and futures to share 120,000 BGB, up to 2200 BGB per user!
0G (0G, Zero G) Simple Earn Product Launches—Subscribe now to enjoy up to 30% APR!
Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








