Chainalysis Report Exposes: Majority of Pump-And-Dump Schemes End in Failure
The Chainalysis report reveals that most illicit pump-and-dump schemes on the Ethereum DEX ecosystem fail to generate profit.
Pump and dump schemes commonly entail an individual or a group of actors investing in a token, vigorously advocating for its value to surge, and then swiftly selling off their holdings for substantial gains. This frequently leads to a sharp drop or complete collapse in the token’s value, adversely affecting holders who were unaware of the manipulation.
Nevertheless, Chainalysis findings reveal a high failure rate of these schemes.
Pump-And-Dumps Plagued by High Failure Rate
Chainalysis delved into pump-and-dump schemes and discovered that between January and December 2023, slightly over 370,000 tokens were introduced on Ethereum. Of these, around 168,600 were accessible for trading on at least one decentralized exchange (DEX).
Among those listed on DEXs, 54% met Chainalysis’s criteria, which is suggestive of potential market manipulation. In 2023, malicious entities collectively gained $241.6 million through these potentially unlawful schemes.
Interestingly, tokens meeting Chainalysis’ criteria yielded an average profit of just $2,672 each, constituting only 1.3% of Ethereum DEX trading volume for 2023, despite the substantial total profit amassed by these actors.
The data shared with CryptoPotato illustrates an ecosystem where bad actors could create tens of thousands of potential pump-and-dump tokens, most of which fail to generate significant profit or attract meaningful trading volume.
The blockchain analytics firm stated,
“Market manipulation, such as pump and dump schemes, are destructive to the crypto markets in the same way they are to traditional markets. However, cryptocurrency’s inherent transparency provides an opportunity to build safer markets. Market operators and government agencies can deploy monitoring tools that can help identify and prioritize areas for further investigation in a way that wouldn’t be possible in traditional markets.”
Shady Deals
Last year, Chainalysis identified that 24% of tokens introduced in 2022 exhibited traits indicative of pump-and-dump activities. It is safe to say that the crypto industry is swarmed with influencers who frequently engage in shady promotion deals without any level of transparency, causing harm to both projects and their supporters.
On-chain sleuth ZachXBT had recently targeted several popular crypto traders in a pump-and-dump scheme. The individuals in question – TraderNJ, PetaByte, XO, and Trader SZ – purportedly profited from the scheme’s gains while disregarding the interests of their followers.
ZachXBT had previously leveled similar allegations against popular crypto influencer Lark Davis as well as American YouTuber Logan Paul for allegedly promoting several pumps and dump schemes.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Has SOL Bottomed Out? Multi-dimensional Data Reveals the True Picture of Solana
Despite the ongoing efforts of new chains such as Sui, Aptos, and Sei, they have not posed a substantial threat to Solana. Even though some user traffic has been diverted to application-specific chains, Solana still firmly holds its leading position among general-purpose chains.

Is 80% Just Hype? Six Major Red Lines Reveal the True Intentions of Stable
It appears to be an infrastructure upgrade, but in essence, it's an early insider-friendly issuance.

80% is Hype? Six Major Red Flags to See Stable's True Intent
It seems to be an infrastructure upgrade, essentially an early insider-friendly distribution.

Is building a native Layer2 blockchain the ultimate strategy for Ethereum DAT to boost mNAV?
With the ongoing evolution of the “crypto-equity integration” trend, a category of publicly listed companies known as “crypto asset treasury companies” is emerging within the industry. Currently, the top three institutional holders have collectively accumulated 4.16 million ETH, forming a significant institutional force that cannot be ignored.

