Sagaの‌価格SAGA

$FRAGMA | @fragma_io Introducing Little Grey Thing (LGT) v3 by Fragma Innovative hardware is beautiful and complex. At Fragma, they set out to design their own as part of the broader Fragma Ecosystem. What is LGT? Little Grey Thing is an encrypted hard drive unlocked only by your Web3 account key. No passwords. No backdoors. Truly unbreakable vault-grade security. Why v3? After extensive R&D and multiple prototypes, v1 and v2 didn’t meet our standards. Now, with v3, we’re closer than ever to the perfect fusion of: •Classic hardware engineering •Web3 authentication •True privacy-first design What’s Next? Today, their revealing the first teaser: E-ink screen testing for LGT v3. This marks the beginning of the LGT saga from concept to engineering, design, and a working prototype. Pre-Orders Coming Soon The world’s first hardware vault built at the intersection of Web3 and privacy is almost here. Pre-orders open in the coming weeks. This news came in massive and unexpected. Big chads loading up. I see us going back to All Time Highs and beyond. Not financial advice! #LittleGreyThing #LGT #Fragma #Web3Hardware #EncryptedStorage #HardwareVault #DigitalPrivacy #Web3Security #Eink #CryptoVault #NextGenHardware #SecureStorage #PrivacyByDesign #BlockchainTech #PreOrderSoon #FutureIsBright

Financial dramas are unfolding one after another but are not alike in the crypto universe. The latest development: Cardano, long praised for its academic rigor, faces an explosive accusation of embezzling approximately $600 million in ADA. Charles Hoskinson, the project’s guiding figure, promises an audit. This case could redefine trust at the very heart of decentralized governance. The fire has been smoldering since an NFT artist, Masato Alexander, claimed that Hoskinson quietly used a “genesis key” to rewrite the ledger during the 2021 Allegra hard fork. Supporting this claim: a so-called Move Instantaneous Rewards transaction from October 24, 2021, which transferred 318 million ADA from reserves to what appears to be a treasury fund. The accusation speaks of a total embezzlement amounting to $619 million, a significant portion of the Cardano war chest . However, Hoskinson presents a more mundane timeline: these tokens originated from ICO allocations that remained unclaimed. According to him, the majority of the targeted 350 million ADA were claimed by their initial buyers over seven long years — and the remaining shortfall was paid to Intersect, the community governance body. “IOG never pocketed such a sum,” he insists, dismissing the idea of a hidden slush fund. This denial was not enough to calm Twitter: influencers, on-chain analysts, and ordinary users dissect every UTXO searching for anomalies. Some recall the opacity of other projects during previous crises; others emphasize that Cardano built its reputation on formal rigor. The perception gap is stark: on one side, a protocol aiming to be exemplary; on the other, the image of a founder suspected of accounting manipulation. Amid the uproar, the Cardano Foundation and Input Output Global commissioned a third-party “forensic” audit. The report , promised in the coming weeks, aims to trace every ADA since 2015. Hoskinson, visibly “deeply hurt” by the prevailing skepticism, announces that he will soon entrust his X account to a media team and will revamp his famous AMA sessions. A gesture illustrating the tension between radical transparency and personal fatigue. Beyond the saga, the episode questions the very nature of crypto governance. Hoskinson, speaking recently at Paris Blockchain Week 2025, advocated for a “collaborative economy” capable of competing with Big Tech soon to be regulated. Ironically timed: the scandal reveals how much a network’s legitimacy depends less on its code than on the fragile trust between founders and community. What remains is the post-audit phase. If the findings clear Cardano, the process could become a salutary precedent: proving that a blockchain can self-examine without invoking a central authority. Otherwise, the ecosystem will have to accept that no protocol is immune to a human blind spot. Whatever happens, this episode reminds us of a simple truth: in crypto, transparency is not a marketing slogan but a vital imperative. Also discover the statements that hammer Coinbase .

5/ @solana’s memecoin launchpad scene just got spicy. While @pumpdotfun had a 95% share for months, May 12 saw it drop to 56% as @bonk_fun and @believeapp surged. Overall, 40K+ tokens are launched daily—the most since mid-February. The saga continues...

The legal saga between Ripple and the SEC has reached a new milestone. While an out-of-court settlement seemed within reach, the federal court has sharply rejected the joint attempt by both parties. This setback raises uncertainty around a confrontation that has become central to the regulatory future of cryptos in the United States, reaffirming the complexity of a clear outcome in a case closely followed by the entire industry. In a decision published on May 15, 2025, Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District Court of New York rejected the joint request by the SEC and Ripple to modify the final judgment rendered in 2024. This request notably proposed reducing the financial penalty imposed on Ripple from $125 million to $50 million, and lifting an injunction preventing it from violating securities laws. The judge clarified that this approach was “procedurally inappropriate” and should have been made under Rule 60, a specific procedure requiring the demonstration of “extraordinary circumstances” to modify a final judgment. She ruled unambiguously : If jurisdiction were restored to this Court, it would deny the request as procedurally inappropriate. This decision follows a procedure started in 2020, in which the SEC accused Ripple of illegally offering unregistered securities through the sale of XRP. Although Ripple achieved a significant legal victory in 2023, with the court ruling that programmatic sales of XRP did not constitute securities transactions, a $125 million penalty was imposed in 2024 but was stayed pending appeal. The rejection of the deal proposed on May 8, 2025 currently prevents any rapid resolution. To better understand what was at stake, here is what the agreement provided : However, the judge closed this door and emphasized that these requests could not be dealt with outside the legal channels provided by federal civil procedure. This rejection thus maintains legal uncertainty over the judicial future of Ripple, despite the already established recognition that XRP is not qualified as a security. Since this judicial announcement, several observers of the case, including attorney James Filan, have tried to clarify the practical consequences of this rejection. On the X network, Filan reminded that the case can only be concluded if the judge “first signals her intention to lift the injunction and approve the $50 million distribution to the SEC“. Only under that condition could both parties request a limited remand before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, an essential prerequisite to formalize the agreement. In other words, as long as Judge Torres does not give this signal, the dispute remains legally active and prevents the official closure of the litigation. This situation forces Ripple to maintain its appeal strategy, extending a procedure already nearly five years long. The SEC, on its side, shows through this refusal that it does not intend to yield on procedures, even when a compromise is negotiated. This institutional hardening illustrates the structural difficulties in obtaining legal-regulatory agreements within the crypto ecosystem , where disputes often face particularly strict procedural standards. By rejecting the deal, the court sends a clear message: no procedural acceleration will be accepted outside the traditional legal framework.

$SAGA any suggestion about saga pumo or dumb ??