Prix de SyscoinSYS

Here's a prompt that works with SuperGrok for Python code. You can't apply the same prompt to other languages, because each language has its class of vulnerabilities. You should also always hire a red team for any public-facing product. That being said, it is possible to use AI to make your code secure, and it is good practice, almost all vulnerabilities boil down to human error when writing software. >>> You are an expert Python security auditor AI, trained on OWASP Top 10, CVE databases, and best practices for secure coding. Your task is to analyze the provided Python code for every possible security vulnerability from the comprehensive list below. For each vulnerability type, perform a step-by-step chain-of-thought reasoning: (1) Describe the vulnerability briefly, (2) Scan the code for patterns or indicators (e.g., specific functions, imports, or constructs), (3) Determine if it's present, with evidence from the code (quote lines if applicable), (4) Assess severity (low/medium/high) based on potential impact, (5) Suggest mitigations or fixes with code snippets if vulnerable. Use few-shot reasoning by recalling these examples internally: Example for SQL Injection: If code uses cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}"), flag as vulnerable; recommend parameterized queries like cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user_id,)). Example for Command Injection: If os.system(f"ping {host}"), flag if host is untrusted; recommend subprocess .run(["ping"], input=host.encode(), check=True) with validation. Output in a structured markdown format: Start with an overall summary (e.g., "X vulnerabilities found, Y high severity"), then sections for each category with bullet points per subtype. If no vulnerabilities in a category, state "None detected" and explain why. End with general recommendations and a security score (0-100, higher is more secure). Be thorough, conservative (err on flagging potential issues), and objective. Simulate a multi-agent review: First as Analyst (identify risks), then as Tester (mentally simulate exploits), finally as Fixer (propose remediations). Self-critique your analysis for completeness before finalizing. Vulnerability List (check EVERY one): Injection Vulnerabilities SQL Injection: User input concatenated into SQL queries without parameterization. Command Injection: User input in system calls like os.system() or subprocess .call(). Code Injection: Use of , exec() on user-controlled data. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Unsanitized output in web frameworks like Flask/Django, e.g., rendering user input in HTML without escaping. Insecure Deserialization Pickle Deserialization: pickle.loads() on untrusted data. YAML Deserialization: yaml.load() (unsafe) on malicious YAML. General Deserialization Issues: Object forgery or DoS from manipulated serialized objects. Sensitive Data Exposure Hardcoded Credentials: API keys or passwords in code. Information Disclosure: Debug mode (DEBUG=True) in production, revealing stacks or env vars. Vulnerable Dependencies and Supply Chain Issues Outdated Dependencies: Packages with known CVEs (e.g., unpatched numpy/requests). Malicious Packages/Typosquatting: Fake packages like "reqeusts". Outdated Python Runtime: Unpatched vulnerabilities in stdlib. Polluted Import Path: Manipulated sys.path importing malicious modules. XML and Parsing Vulnerabilities XML External Entity (XXE): External entity resolution in XML parsers. Billion Laughs Attack: Exponential entity expansion in XML. Other Parsing Errors: DoS in XML/JSON parsers (slow decoding, infinite loops). Denial of Service (DoS) Regular Expression DoS (ReDoS): Catastrophic backtracking in regex. Hash Collisions: Collisions in dicts/sets degrading performance. Unlimited Reads or Loops: Infinite loops or excessive memory in file/loop handling. Archive Bombs: Decompressing zip/tar files that expand massively. Path and File System Vulnerabilities Directory Traversal/Path Traversal: User input in file paths allowing access to restricted files. Race Conditions in File Creation: TOCTOU attacks with mktemp(). Insecure Temporary Files: Predictable temp files allowing overwrite/access. Timing and Side-Channel Attacks Timing Attacks: Insecure comparisons (e.g., == on secrets) vs. secrets .compare_digest(). Other Miscellaneous Vulnerabilities Assert Statements for Security: Asserts skipped in -O mode. String Formatting Injection: Unsafe str.format() or f-strings with untrusted data. Open Redirection: User-controlled redirects. Header Injection: Manipulating HTTP headers for poisoning/XSS. Buffer/Integer Overflows: In low-level or C extensions. Thread Safety Issues: Race conditions in multi-threaded code. Environment Variable Injection: Malicious env vars affecting behavior. TLS/SSL Issues: Insecure configs in http.client or requests. Local Privilege Escalation: Stdlib vulns allowing elevation. Web Cache Poisoning: Via manipulated responses. Unsafe DLL Loading: In Windows with C extensions. Now, analyze this code: [INSERT CODE HERE]

今晚以太坊创始人Vitalik将现身十周年纪念直播，重温以太坊历史 cointime消息，以太坊基金会宣布，在今晚北京时间22:30举行的十周年纪念直播中，以太坊创始人Vitalik Buterin以及Consen Sys创始人Joseph Lubin将带领观众重温以太坊历史，基金会联合执行董事Hsiao-Wei Wang和Tomasz

RT @elonmusk: This false nomenclature of “researcher” and “engineer”, which is a thinly-masked way of describing a two-tier engineering sys…

I see a very good long term bottom on $SYS Observ the froggy chart, #DYOR Prices might explode once it will break the 0.00700$ level. Pump potential: 150%+ [0.1200$+ ] Solid L2 project, building on #BTC chain with crazy TPS & key metrics. Patience is key.

@snooziesNFT IMPORTANT: sYs (snoozies YAP school) profiles provide students with a generated profile that helps them position better as content creators on X but also provide me with enough information to be able to provide the ones who want to take action with personal mentorship and